<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quantity VS. Quality Visitors – Is it That Obvious?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html</link>
	<description>Build Traffic, Make Money Online &#38; Sip on a Cup of Success!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:42:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Coryan</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-292</link>
		<dc:creator>Coryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 06:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-292</guid>
		<description>This is the issue I have been struggling with for the past month. I&#039;ve had some posts get stumbled, but only one got some real support from SU visitors. I guess I lean toward the side of any visitor is a potential longterm reader. If they never see my blog, they will never become a regular. But this is an interesting debate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the issue I have been struggling with for the past month. I&#8217;ve had some posts get stumbled, but only one got some real support from SU visitors. I guess I lean toward the side of any visitor is a potential longterm reader. If they never see my blog, they will never become a regular. But this is an interesting debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rhyan</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-191</link>
		<dc:creator>rhyan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 19:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-191</guid>
		<description>I still go for quality visitors who participate or interacts on certain topics you brought up but if you run a monetize site quantity would be better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still go for quality visitors who participate or interacts on certain topics you brought up but if you run a monetize site quantity would be better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick- road2blogging.com</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-190</link>
		<dc:creator>nick- road2blogging.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 17:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-190</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;re right that we all should be striving for quality readers to our blogs, heck having people at least comment on your blog means you&#039;re getting quality traffic doesn&#039;t it? (well, some anyhow, lol).&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;In the long-term as long as you have readers coming back again and again I think monetizing them will be easier, as they &#039;trust&#039; you - all you have to do then is keep on posting for your readers, not yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;re right that we all should be striving for quality readers to our blogs, heck having people at least comment on your blog means you&#8217;re getting quality traffic doesn&#8217;t it? (well, some anyhow, lol).</p>
<p>In the long-term as long as you have readers coming back again and again I think monetizing them will be easier, as they &#8216;trust&#8217; you &#8211; all you have to do then is keep on posting for your readers, not yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steven wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>steven wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-187</guid>
		<description>Interesting post Jay.We all try to drive traffic to our sites in hopes of making money,and getting loyal readers.As you mention a lot of the people we draw just walk away without coming in.&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Quality readers outway quanity readers by far in my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting post Jay.We all try to drive traffic to our sites in hopes of making money,and getting loyal readers.As you mention a lot of the people we draw just walk away without coming in.</p>
<p>Quality readers outway quanity readers by far in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon Hurley Hall</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon Hurley Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-186</guid>
		<description>I have found while using Entrecard that I get a lot of visitors - and some of them come back for more and have subscribed to my newsletter and feed. So I think getting the quantity  in will eventually lead to some quality visitors who stick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have found while using Entrecard that I get a lot of visitors &#8211; and some of them come back for more and have subscribed to my newsletter and feed. So I think getting the quantity  in will eventually lead to some quality visitors who stick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blogtommy</title>
		<link>http://www.datmoney.com/2008/01/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious.html/comment-page-1#comment-185</link>
		<dc:creator>blogtommy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 23:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://datmoney.com/2008/01/11/quantity-vs-quality-visitors-%e2%80%93-is-it-that-obvious/#comment-185</guid>
		<description>You really get to the heart of the matter with this post.  I&#039;ve been wrestling with the same basic dichotomy in the advertising circles.  Do you pound pound pound (annoy annoy annoy) since common knowledge says it takes the average person 7-10 times seeing something before they spark interest....OR do you treat your email list like a fine wine and only hit it up occasionally or even rarely in hopes they will not be annoyed and actually take notice...Tough call at times...but although more of a beer guy myself...I guess I tend towards the wine side of things in this equation (quality)...good topic though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You really get to the heart of the matter with this post.  I&#8217;ve been wrestling with the same basic dichotomy in the advertising circles.  Do you pound pound pound (annoy annoy annoy) since common knowledge says it takes the average person 7-10 times seeing something before they spark interest&#8230;.OR do you treat your email list like a fine wine and only hit it up occasionally or even rarely in hopes they will not be annoyed and actually take notice&#8230;Tough call at times&#8230;but although more of a beer guy myself&#8230;I guess I tend towards the wine side of things in this equation (quality)&#8230;good topic though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
